How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood

In neurocognitive research on language, the processing principles of the system at hand are usually assumed to be relatively invariant. However, research on attention, memory, decision-making, and social judgment has shown that mood can substantially modulate how the brain processes information. For example, in a bad mood, people typically have a narrower focus of attention and rely less on heuristics. In the face of such pervasive mood effects elsewhere in the brain, it seems unlikely that language processing would remain untouched. In an EEG experiment, we manipulated the mood of participants just before they read texts that confirmed or disconfirmed verb-based expectations about who would be talked about next (e.g., that “David praised Linda because … ” would continue about Linda, not David), or that respected or violated a syntactic agreement rule (e.g., “The boys turns”). ERPs showed that mood had little effect on syntactic parsing, but did substantially affect referential anticipation: whereas readers anticipated information about a specific person when they were in a good mood, a bad mood completely abolished such anticipation. A behavioral follow-up experiment suggested that a bad mood did not interfere with verb-based expectations per se, but prevented readers from using that information rapidly enough to predict upcoming reference on the fly, as the sentence unfolds. In all, our results reveal that background mood, a rather unobtrusive affective state, selectively changes a crucial aspect of real-time language processing. This observation fits well with other observed interactions between language processing and affect (emotions, preferences, attitudes, mood), and more generally testifies to the importance of studying “cold” cognitive functions in relation to “hot” aspects of the brain

Using Facial EMG to Track Emotion During Language Comprehension: Past, Present, and Future

Beyond recognizing words, parsing sentences, building situation models, and other cognitive accomplishments, language comprehension always involves some degree of emotion too, with or without awareness. Language excites, bores, or otherwise moves us, and studying how it does so is crucial. This chapter examines the potential of facial electromyography (EMG) to study language-elicited emotion. After discussing the limitations of self-report measures, we examine various other tools to tap into emotion, and then zoom in on the electrophysiological recording of facial muscle activity. Surveying psycholinguistics, communication science, and other fields, we provide an exhaustive qualitative review of the relevant facial EMG research to date, exploring 55 affective comprehension experiments with single words, phrases, sentences, or larger pieces of discourse. We discuss the outcomes of this research, and evaluate the various practices, biases, and omissions in the field. We also present the fALC model, a new conceptual model that lays out the various potential sources of facial EMG activity during language comprehension. Our review suggests that facial EMG recording is a powerful tool for exploring the conscious as well as unconscious aspects of affective language comprehension. However, we also think it is time to take on a bit more complexity in this research field, by for example considering the possibility that multiple active generators can simultaneously contribute to an emotional facial expression, by studying how the communicator’s stance and social intention can give rise to emotion, and by studying facial expressions not just as indexes of inner states, but also as social tools that enrich everyday verbal interactions

When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle: An Event-Related Potential Study on the Pragmatics of Negation

Our brains rapidly map incoming language onto what we hold to be true. Yet there are claims that such integration and verification processes are delayed in sentences containing negation words like not. However, studies have often confounded whether a statement is true and whether it is a natural thing to say during normal communication. In an event-related potential (ERP) experiment, we aimed to disentangle effects of truth value and pragmatic licensing on the comprehension of affirmative and negated real-world statements. As in affirmative sentences, false words elicited a larger N400 ERP than did true words in pragmatically licensed negated sentences (e.g., “In moderation, drinking red wine isn't bad/good…”), whereas true and false words elicited similar responses in unlicensed negated sentences (e.g., “A baby bunny's fur isn't very hard/soft…”). These results suggest that negation poses no principled obstacle for readers to immediately relate incoming words to what they hold to be true

Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender

Two picture-naming experiments tested the hypothesis that the speed with which native speakers of a gender-marking language retrieve the grammatical gender of a noun from their mental lexicon may depend on the recency of earlier access to that same noun's gender. Ss were 96 native speakers of Dutch. Recent gender access did not facilitate the production of gender-marked adjective noun phrases (Exp 1), nor that of gender-marked definite article noun phrases (Exp 2), even though naming times for the latter utterances were sensitive to the gender of a written distractor word superimposed on the picture to be named. This last result replicates and extends earlier gender-specific picture-word interference results found in H. Schriefers's 1993 study, showing that one can selectively tap into the production of grammatical gender agreement during speaking. The findings are relevant to theories of speech production and the representation of grammatical gender for that process